Ok I can think of a few more words... but seriously what on earth were they thinking? It's as if (And they probably did) take the characters only, not the universe or any of the previous stories, ate them, waited for about 14 hours, then used what came out to construct a series of images that made up this bag of tripe. Anyone who thinks this movie was in the least bit good should be shot with tiny little pellets that don't kill but sting like a beehatch.
Lighten up on the swearing! I don't care what you guys think about this. I happen to like this movie, and it's pretty good, no matter what the critics say. And I noticed, that in the scene where Thomas is going down Muffle Mountain, he's COMPUTER-ANIMATED! And why couldn't have they at least make all the engines mouths move?
Director, Producer, Illustrator, Voice Actor, and Co-Writer of the VRS. Wrote for the Shining Time Station Fansite's Episode Guide. Lead Actor, Vocal Director, and Writer for the #ThomasCreatorCollective. And also Winner of the following awards from IMTA-LA '17 & '18: -Monologue -Singing -Improvisation -Cold Read -Male Actor of the Year -Test Screen -TV Real People (Man, this guy's done a lot! ;D). For more, check out my VO website, www.manyvoicesofjoel.com.
Ok, so it wasn't that great. But it was still Thomas, people. There's something to be said for that.
I liked it when I was little, but I have to admit that I strongly dislike it now. That doesn't mean that I hate it or I "want to shoot the people who liked it with tiny bullets that don't kill but sting terriblely."
I thought that the music was good at least. I own the soundtrack it's so good, in fact.
Well, IMO, I think the new models were to ONLY be used for the movie, but because of it flopping and low money count....yeah, you got the picture. The soundtrack is actually very good, i give it 4 stars. ^^ I just wish I had the CD...or some MP3's, lol. And it WAS kinda nice to see Shining Time Station again...even if it didn't look exactly the same as before.
I thought the film was over-rated. Some people said it was good but I don't agree with them because:
1. Not all of the characters were featured. 2. They should have redubbed when the characters said "railroad" instead of "railway". 3. How could Diesel 10 and Lady be characters from the past when we only first saw them in the movie? 4. There's no way that any tank locomotive can be faster than the class of diesel that Diesel 10 is based on.
To me, the film was not good but at the same time not that bad
The film was a horrible flop, with a very very poor plot, multiple technical flaws and was obviously the concoction of someone whose knowledge of railways would fit onto the pointy end of a pin and leave room for their basic common sense.
Frankly, it was an insult and I would not be surprised if the late Rev W Awdry (God bless him) turned in his grave because of the abomination that has become of his works and characters.
The Thomas Feature Film SHOULD have been a lot better. This is a multi-million dollar franchise with a very rich history behind it, and Allcroft saw fit to turn it into something it wasn't.
Something more subtle along the lines of what they did for Calling All Engines would have been better. A more straightforward storyline for one, and one that fits in with the general TV/RS world of Thomas. But mind you, it HAD to be something flash for the Box Office to draw the crowds in, which would ultimately be a problem for a Kid's TV show spin-off movie.
The fact is these movies very rarely, if ever work, when the show is dead and buried years before. Hence the fact we're getting the Dukes of Hazzard, Starsky and Hutch and all that making Big Screen comebacks.
The only one I could commend for doing a good job on their film, while the show as still running would be The Power Rangers. They did their movie following their second season, most likely to cash in on the popularity of the show's worldwide appeal. It did the job because it was one big adventure which followed the TV show to the letter.
But sadly, Thomas's feature film didn't. And to be honest, would a film that was somewhat like the gentle tales written by the Rev Awdry be exciting enough for the modern day audiences outside of Thomas Fans? Because really, we need to look at general cinema goers as well, I dunno if Thomas would have that broad appeal. And then again, we all know that the fans expect something before they walk through the door as well - to see what they get on TV!
And the bad thing is that the minute they see the advertisement, they automatically know - "I've seen that on the television!" and the split happens to be there! Your opinion's been made before you even walk through the door, because you're already familiar with whether or not you'd want to see these characters. At least with stuff like The Incredibles! and Finding Nemo, these are fresh new beings which there is still an air of mystery about, so it wouldn't be as easy to shun them without at least having ONE look!
Allcroft was up against a tough one here from the word Go. Rather ironic as I suppose that would have been the last word she'd have heard from the Gullane Execs when they found out how much the film actually grossed...
Ah well, it only cost about £10 million to make anyway, so a fairly cheaply made film by all accounts, and the company would have at least made their return on it. So that's one consolation for them I suppose!
It's not often that a movie made from a TV show does well at box office. From the top of my head I think that the only TV show based movies that are good are Addams family (the first 2) and South Park.
Remember when I said that Alcroft only put Shining time in this movie so it would appeal to Americans? I've just thought of 2 films that have just done something simillar. "The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen" had an American called Tom Sawyer because they reckon that Americans wouldn't want to see the film if an American wasn't in it.
Another example is the Street Fighter movie which was a flop. In the game Ryu was the protaganist. In the movie it was Guile. I reckon they did this to give Jean-Claude Van Damme a big role and he was american.
Sleeper Agent: Don't think he's logged in for a while, certainly he hasn't posted in over a year.BTW how did you insert those icons? Seen some people use non SiF emojis as well but I can't get them to format when occasionally trying with the keypad symbol buttons instead
Sept 9, 2019 16:43:22 GMT
Mr. Coffey Pot: I have another special video premiere for tonight at 9 PM UK time of my recent trip to the Midland Railway and the Star Tugs exhibition coach! youtu.be/v77oKMgee24
Sept 9, 2019 19:25:28 GMT
pugsy: Im a few hours late but happy Friday the thirteenth, there wont be another until December
Sept 14, 2019 14:12:12 GMT
NikeScot: Hi, could anyone tell me the diameter of the face of a golden bear Thomas??
Sept 14, 2019 16:37:39 GMT
engine87546: Did u seen the where wolves out since it was a full moon as well
Sept 15, 2019 0:44:51 GMT
Old Fusspot: Alan B'Stard and I have added a Twitter page for our new podcast, Talking Thomas! Check us out there, on Anchor, or on Spotify! twitter.com/TalkingThomas1
Sept 15, 2019 17:26:13 GMT
Sleeper Agent: Did ask on Twitter NikeScot but no nibbles i'm afraid, surely someone here owns a Golden Bear Thom! Trying to access the Real Lives of Thomas site but it's down again for the umpteenth time, can anyone provide a link for the archive site as I can't find it
Sept 15, 2019 21:14:56 GMT
Sleeper Agent: That's the badger thanks, just couldn't re-find it on Google Edit it doesn't actually state when Awdry's first James model was built beyond '1950s', does anyone know of the precise year?
Sept 16, 2019 7:48:40 GMT
Sleeper Agent: Never mind found it on the wayback site, 1951 if the Feb 94 issue of Model Railway Enthusiast can be trusted.
Sept 18, 2019 21:12:36 GMT
Vought Sikorsky: Do any of you lot remember Best of Times...Worst of Times? I legitimately forgot about it until just recently when I was searching through the old SIF Productions page & found it. Quite a nice venture it was.
Sept 18, 2019 23:53:09 GMT
ScarletSpider: I got £1060 after tax today for the last month of wages. Noice
Sept 20, 2019 1:58:47 GMT